personcraft
Comparison

Trained identity vs. one-off images

One image is easy. The same character in a hundred images is a different problem.

One-off image generation

A generic text-to-image generator produces a new interpretation every time you ask for an image — even with nearly the same prompt, the face, proportions, or outfit design can vary from one generation to the next. For a single standalone image, that doesn't matter. For a character you need to recognize across 10, 30, or 100 shots of a project, it does.

The manual fix — training your own identity model (LoRA) on your own images — is technically possible with open-source tools, but it requires curating a dataset, configuring a training run, and technical judgment most filmmakers don't need or want to learn.

Trained identity, built in

PersonCraft folds that training into the normal character-creation flow: you pick the design, PersonCraft assembles the dataset, and you review and approve the images before training the LoRA. Every new scene reuses that identity, without having to configure a training run yourself.

When each one makes sense

If you need a single illustration or a loose concept, a generic generator is faster and cheaper. If your character needs to be recognizable across multiple scenes — a short film, a music video, a series of scenes for social — training the identity once may help reduce repeated corrections. The cost and consistency depend on the number of shots, retries, and the quality you need.

How to keep AI character identity consistent | PersonCraft